Desempeño sísmico de edificios de concreto reforzado estructurados a base de marcos resistentes a momento y contravientos restringidos al pandeo
Article Sidebar
Publicado
jun 4, 2025
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##
https://doi.org/10.36677/rici.v3i2.25624
Main Article Content
Alfredo Félix Soto
http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1271-7486
Alfredo Reyes Salazar
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5074-1526
Oliver Santos Amador
http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3737-1761
Mario Daniel Llanes Tizoc
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3641-0656
Juan Daniel Trasviña Soberanes Federico Valenzuela Beltrán
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2528-9475
http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1271-7486
Alfredo Reyes Salazar
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5074-1526
Oliver Santos Amador
http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3737-1761
Mario Daniel Llanes Tizoc
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3641-0656
Juan Daniel Trasviña Soberanes Federico Valenzuela Beltrán
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2528-9475
Resumen
Esta investigación tiene como propósito evaluar el desempeño sísmico de edificios de concreto reforzado ubicados en suelo blando de la Ciudad de México, en términos de las pérdidas económicas esperadas. Los modelos son a base de marcos resistentes a momento y alternativamente se utilizarán sistemas disipadores de energía, en este caso contravientos restringidos al pandeo. Se realizan análisis dinámicos no lineales para diferentes niveles de intensidad sísmica con el objetivo de obtener parámetros de respuesta estructural como distorsiones de entrepiso y aceleraciones de piso. Por último, se evaluará el desempeño sísmico de los edificios mediante el uso de la segunda generación de metodologías de diseño sísmico basado en desempeño del FEMA P-58, para obtener resultados en términos de pérdidas anuales esperadas (EAL) y realizar un análisis de costo-beneficio para identificar las mejores opciones de diseño.
Article Details
Como citar
FÉLIX SOTO, Alfredo et al.
Desempeño sísmico de edificios de concreto reforzado estructurados a base de marcos resistentes a momento y contravientos restringidos al pandeo.
Ideas en Ciencias de la Ingeniería, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 58-77, jun. 2025.
ISSN 2992-7447.
Disponible en: <https://ideasencienciasingenieria.uaemex.mx/article/view/25624>. Fecha de acceso: 26 ago. 2026
doi: https://doi.org/10.36677/rici.v3i2.25624.
Sección
Artículos
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
Citas
[1] Perrone G, Cardone D, O’Reilly GJ, Sullivan TJ. Developing a Direct Approach for Estimating Expected Annual Losses of Italian Buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2019;00:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1657988.
[2] Cremen G, Baker JW. Quantifying the benefits of building instruments to FEMA P-58 rapid post-earthquake damage and loss predictions. Eng Struct 2018;176:243–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.017.
[3] Caruso C, Bento R, Castro JM. A contribution to the seismic performance and loss assessment of old RC wall-frame buildings. Eng Struct 2019;197:109369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109369.
[4] Hwang SH, Jeon JS, Lee K. Evaluation of economic losses and collapse safety of steel moment frame buildings designed for risk categories II and IV. Eng Struct 2019;201:109830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109830.
[5] Giordano N, Mosalam KM, Günay S. Probabilistic performance-based seismic assessment of an existing masonry building. Earthquake Spectra 2020;36:271–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878191.
[6] Valenzuela-Beltran F, Ramon Gaxiola-Camacho J, Llanes-Tizoc MD, Baca V, Leal-Graciano JM, Reyes-Salazar A. Seismic loss assessment of code-compliant moment-resisting RC buildings located on different soil conditions of Mexico City. Eng Struct 2024;300:117195. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2023.117195.
[7] González C, Niño M, Jaimes MA. Event-based assessment of seismic resilience in Mexican school buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2020;18:6313–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00938-5.
[8] Santos-Santiago MA, Ruiz SE. Optimal design of buildings under wind and earthquake, considering cumulative damage. J Build Eng 2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104760.
[9] Victor Vaca, Juan Bojórquez, Edén Bojórquez, Herian Leyva, Alfredo Reyes-Salazar. Enhanced Seismic Structural Reliability on Reinforced Concrete Buildings by Using Buckling Restrained Braces. Hindawi 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8816552.
[10] Puttatt J, Jayarajan ], Formerly ]. Seismic Evaluation of Concentric Braced Frames using Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Time History analysis. International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IJERMCE) 2019;4.
[11] Reglamento de Construcciones de la Ciudad de México 2017. Normas Técnicas Complementarias para Diseño y Construcción de Estructuras de Acero . 2017.
[12] Federal Emergency Managment Agency (FEMA). Seismic performance assessment of buildings volume 3 – supporting electronic materials and background documentation. Fema P-58; 2018.
[13] Moehle J, Deierlein G. A FRAMEWORK METHODOLOGY FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2004.
[14] Shome N. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures. Stanford University 1999.
[15] Computers and Structures, Inc., ETABS [Software]. Disponible en: https://www.csiespana.com/software/5/etabs#
[16] Vamvatsikos D, Allin Cornell C. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
[17] Mckenna F., Fenves G., Scott M. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation 2000.
[18] Baker JW, Bradley BA, Stafford PJ. Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis. First Edition. Cambridge University Press; 2021.
[19] Turner & Townsend. International Construction Market Survey 2022. 2022.
[20] Silva A, Castro JM, Monteiro R. A rational approach to the conversion of FEMA P- 58 seismic repair costs to Europe. Earthq Spectra 2020:36-1607–18. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.1177/8755293019899964.
[21] Porter K., Farokhnia D., Vamvatsikos D., Cho I. Guidelines for component- based analytical vulnerability assessment of buildings and nonstructural elements 2015.
[22] Gutierrez JJ, Ayala Millan AG. ANÁLISIS DE LA RESILIENCIA SÍSMICA DE EDIFICIOS. Revista de Ingeniería Sísmica 2022:47–73. https://doi.org/10.18867/ris.107.603.
[2] Cremen G, Baker JW. Quantifying the benefits of building instruments to FEMA P-58 rapid post-earthquake damage and loss predictions. Eng Struct 2018;176:243–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.017.
[3] Caruso C, Bento R, Castro JM. A contribution to the seismic performance and loss assessment of old RC wall-frame buildings. Eng Struct 2019;197:109369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109369.
[4] Hwang SH, Jeon JS, Lee K. Evaluation of economic losses and collapse safety of steel moment frame buildings designed for risk categories II and IV. Eng Struct 2019;201:109830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109830.
[5] Giordano N, Mosalam KM, Günay S. Probabilistic performance-based seismic assessment of an existing masonry building. Earthquake Spectra 2020;36:271–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878191.
[6] Valenzuela-Beltran F, Ramon Gaxiola-Camacho J, Llanes-Tizoc MD, Baca V, Leal-Graciano JM, Reyes-Salazar A. Seismic loss assessment of code-compliant moment-resisting RC buildings located on different soil conditions of Mexico City. Eng Struct 2024;300:117195. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2023.117195.
[7] González C, Niño M, Jaimes MA. Event-based assessment of seismic resilience in Mexican school buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2020;18:6313–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00938-5.
[8] Santos-Santiago MA, Ruiz SE. Optimal design of buildings under wind and earthquake, considering cumulative damage. J Build Eng 2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104760.
[9] Victor Vaca, Juan Bojórquez, Edén Bojórquez, Herian Leyva, Alfredo Reyes-Salazar. Enhanced Seismic Structural Reliability on Reinforced Concrete Buildings by Using Buckling Restrained Braces. Hindawi 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8816552.
[10] Puttatt J, Jayarajan ], Formerly ]. Seismic Evaluation of Concentric Braced Frames using Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Time History analysis. International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IJERMCE) 2019;4.
[11] Reglamento de Construcciones de la Ciudad de México 2017. Normas Técnicas Complementarias para Diseño y Construcción de Estructuras de Acero . 2017.
[12] Federal Emergency Managment Agency (FEMA). Seismic performance assessment of buildings volume 3 – supporting electronic materials and background documentation. Fema P-58; 2018.
[13] Moehle J, Deierlein G. A FRAMEWORK METHODOLOGY FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2004.
[14] Shome N. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures. Stanford University 1999.
[15] Computers and Structures, Inc., ETABS [Software]. Disponible en: https://www.csiespana.com/software/5/etabs#
[16] Vamvatsikos D, Allin Cornell C. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
[17] Mckenna F., Fenves G., Scott M. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation 2000.
[18] Baker JW, Bradley BA, Stafford PJ. Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis. First Edition. Cambridge University Press; 2021.
[19] Turner & Townsend. International Construction Market Survey 2022. 2022.
[20] Silva A, Castro JM, Monteiro R. A rational approach to the conversion of FEMA P- 58 seismic repair costs to Europe. Earthq Spectra 2020:36-1607–18. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.1177/8755293019899964.
[21] Porter K., Farokhnia D., Vamvatsikos D., Cho I. Guidelines for component- based analytical vulnerability assessment of buildings and nonstructural elements 2015.
[22] Gutierrez JJ, Ayala Millan AG. ANÁLISIS DE LA RESILIENCIA SÍSMICA DE EDIFICIOS. Revista de Ingeniería Sísmica 2022:47–73. https://doi.org/10.18867/ris.107.603.